Teams spend most of their Kubernetes time debugging, not building. This is the map to the errors that eat that time: what each one means, how to diagnose it fast, and the fix.
Surveys keep finding the same thing: teams spend the majority of their Kubernetes time troubleshooting rather than shipping. The errors aren't exotic. It's the same dozen states, over and over, each with a name that tells you almost nothing until you've hit it a few times. This guide is the map. For each common failure it says what the state actually means, how to diagnose it in a couple of commands, and where the fix lives.
The universal first move, before any specific error, is to read what the cluster is telling you:
kubectl get pods -o wide
kubectl describe pod <pod> # Events at the bottom are the story
kubectl logs <pod> --previous # Logs from the crashed instance
kubectl get events --sort-by=.lastTimestamp
Nine times out of ten the answer is in describe events or --previous logs. The full command kit is in kubectl commands for debugging any pod.
Almost every Kubernetes failure falls into one of four buckets: it won't start (image/config), it won't schedule (resources/placement), it dies (memory/eviction), or it can't be reached (networking). Naming the bucket from kubectl describe and events turns a scary state into a short checklist. Reliability practices like disruption budgets (Pod Disruption Budgets) and reading memory pressure early (Linux memory pressure with PSI) prevent a chunk of these before they page you.
Learn to read describe events and --previous logs first; they answer most incidents in seconds. Bookmark the four buckets, and when a new error shows up, place it in a bucket before you start guessing. Each linked guide is the fast path for one specific failure. The teams that spend less time troubleshooting aren't luckier; they've turned each of these from a mystery into a runbook.
Get the latest tutorials, guides, and insights on AI, DevOps, Cloud, and Infrastructure delivered directly to your inbox.
Both run pipelines as CRDs inside your cluster, but they were built for different jobs. Here's how Tekton and Argo Workflows actually differ in practice.
Every CI/CD platform claims to be fast and easy. The real differences are in pricing, self-hosting, and where each one falls apart at scale. This is the map.
Explore more articles in this category
Every CI/CD platform claims to be fast and easy. The real differences are in pricing, self-hosting, and where each one falls apart at scale. This is the map.
Woodpecker forked Drone when the license changed. Here's how the two compare for small teams and homelabs that just want simple container-native CI.
Buildkite runs the control plane and lets you own the compute; Actions keeps everything close to your repo. Here's how they actually differ once you scale.
Evergreen posts worth revisiting.