Skip to main content
RAG in Production: Reliability, Latency, and Cost for LLM Apps

RAG in Production: Reliability, Latency, and Cost for LLM Apps

KU
• 1 min read•26 views

Run retrieval-augmented generation at scale. Chunking, caching, and observability.

RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) powers many LLM apps. Here’s how to run it reliably in production.

Architecture Basics

  1. Ingest: Chunk documents, embed, store in a vector DB.
  2. Query: Embed query, retrieve top-k, optionally re-rank, then prompt LLM with context.

Reliability

  • Retries with backoff for embedding and LLM APIs.
  • Fallbacks (e.g. cached answer or “try again”) when retrieval or LLM fails.
  • Timeouts so one slow call doesn’t block the whole request.

Latency

  • Cache frequent queries or embeddings where safe.
  • Async embedding for ingest; keep query path synchronous and fast.
  • Re-ranking: Use a small re-ranker only when needed to balance quality and latency.

Cost

  • Chunk size and top-k affect token usage; tune for quality vs cost.
  • Model choice: Smaller or quantized models for simple tasks; reserve larger models for hard queries.

Best practice: add metrics (latency p95, cache hit rate, cost per query) and alerts so you can iterate.

Explore topics:AI
React
Share this post
KU

Kiril Urbonas

AI Engineer

553 articles
View all articles by Kiril Urbonas

You might have missed

Evergreen posts worth revisiting.